Rising KashmirRising KashmirRising Kashmir
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • News
    • Kashmir
    • City
    • Jammu
    • Politics
  • Health
  • Anchor
  • Features
  • Interview
  • Video
Search

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022

Categories

  • Anchor
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • City
  • Developing Story
  • Editorial
  • Education
  • Features
  • Health
  • Interview
  • Jammu
  • Jammu and Kashmir News
  • Kashmir
  • Kashmir Tourism
  • Kath Bath
  • National
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Top Stories
  • Trending
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • Viewpoint
  • World
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Conclusive Argument of God and the Prophet Ibrahim (‘AS)
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Rising KashmirRising Kashmir
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • News
  • Health
  • Anchor
  • Features
  • Interview
  • Video
Search
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • News
    • Kashmir
    • City
    • Jammu
    • Politics
  • Health
  • Anchor
  • Features
  • Interview
  • Video
Follow US
© 2024. All Rights Reserved.
Rising Kashmir > Blog > Opinion > Conclusive Argument of God and the Prophet Ibrahim (‘AS)
Opinion

Conclusive Argument of God and the Prophet Ibrahim (‘AS)

The great struggle of Prophet Ibrahim (‘AS) is a proof of the fact that God didn’t want to enforce His will on humanity

DR. AREEF JAMAEI
Last updated: June 17, 2024 1:31 am
DR. AREEF JAMAEI
Published: June 17, 2024
Share
9 Min Read
SHARE

 Religion is commonly defined as “a system of faith and worship.” It provides “the structure that organizes one’s devotion to something.” The component of faith in it “describes one’s inward belief in a teaching, based on personal conviction, trust and confidence in something or someone.” As such, based on belief, conviction and confidence from within, religion takes the shape of worship from without. This obvious dimension of religion is deemed nothing more than the organization and externalization of devotion. The component of teaching at best gives the expression of the inherent faith and conviction. Religion is thus deemed to be something which is more felt than understood after demonstration and inquiry.

 

However, the scheme of things devised by God vis-à-vis religion is totally different. Actually, the faculty of reason, rationality and conscience which humans have been bestowed with needed complete freedom to choose between right and wrong after understanding what both meant not only for her/him as an individual or collectively as society but for the whole cosmos as such. That is why God categorically declared: “Say, the Truth is from your Lord: let him who will, believe, and let him who will, reject.” (18:29).

 

Moreover, God also said: “We showed him the Way: whether he be grateful or ungrateful.” (76:3). This declaration, on the part of God, comes with complete explanation and elaboration of Truth and Falsehood so that humans could opt for any of the two courses after complete understanding and analysis. This is what the Qur’an says in this regard: “Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error.” (2:256). Moreover, it has been made clear that coercion, on the part of God, could have turned human reason and rationality into an absurdity with no purpose to serve as such.

 

The Qur’an, in this regard, says: “If your Lord had so willed, He could have made mankind one People: but they will not cease to dispute.” (11:118) That is why the Last Prophet (SAW), like every Prophet (‘AS) of God was advised that he had not been commissioned to compel anyone to believe: “If it had been your Lord’s Will, they would all have believed, –all who are on earth! Will you then compel mankind, against their will, to believe?” (10:99)

 

The great struggle of Prophet Ibrahim (‘AS) is a proof of the fact that God didn’t want to enforce His will on humanity. What was intended is that the upholders of Falsehood should face the upholders of Truth not in physical duals but in ideological debates and argumentation. By doing so the ideological strength of Truth should be established once for all and Falsehood, in spite of numerical superiority, should be defeated in the ideological field. This job was done so nicely by Prophet Ibrahim (‘AS) that he was declared “a nation or a whole community in himself.”(16:120)

However, this dialogue and argumentation is so evident in the endeavour of Prophet Ibrahim (‘AS) that modern academia should in no way declare that “dialogue of civilizations, cultures or religions” is its brainchild or innovation. Actually, the Prophets (‘AS), throughout the ages, have made dialogue one of the modes of their communicating the message of God to the people. In this regard, the fact should be borne in mind that inquisitive minds have always de-conditioned themselves before embarking upon their mission through dialogue and argumentation. Dialogue, in its very nature, has been a multilayered and multidimensional enterprise. In the beginning of the process of dialogue, a person starts understanding one’s socio-cultural moorings and religious milieu by raising questions on its various aspects.

 

Prophet Ibrahim (‘AS) had been well acquainted with this capacity and ability so as to be able to confront his people who had a worldview of their own. This is how the Qur’an hints to this aspect of Ibrahim (‘AS): “We bestowed aforetime on Abraham his rectitude of conduct, and We were well acquainted with him.” (21:51) It is this “rectitude” which led him to question and challenge the whole pantheon of deities revered and worshipped by his people. This is how, according to the Qur’an, Ibrahim (‘AS) started checking the foundations of this pantheon: “When the night covered him over, he saw a star (and) he said: This is my Lord. But when it set, he said: I do not love those that set. When he saw the moon rising in splendour, he said: This is my Lord. But when the moon set, he said: Unless my Lord guide me, I shall surely be among those who go astray. When he saw the sun rising in splendour, he said: This is my Lord; this is the greatest (of all). But when the sun set, he said: O my people! I am indeed free from your (guilt) of giving partners to Allah.” (6:76-78) It is clear that Ibrahim (‘AS) didn’t accept, even for the sake of argument, the star, the moon or the sun as his deity. What he did was that he made the belief of his people the base of his argument and rejected it on the basis that none of these were eternal or everlasting, the quality of the True Lord.

 

As the common people failed to convince or frighten Ibrahim (‘AS) and dissuade him from his stand, the argumentation reached the royal court. Naturally, there were two reasons behind this move: one, Ibrahim (‘AS) could be frightened of the grandeur of the royal court, and two, he could be frightened of the consequences of the ruler’s displeasure. However, the whole exercise backfired as the ruler too failed to satisfy Ibrahim (‘AS). Thus, according to the Qur’an, continued the argumentation in the royal court: “Have you not turned your vision to one who disputed with Abraham about his Lord, because Allah had granted him power? Abraham said: My Lord is He Who gives life and death. He said: I give life and death. Said Abraham: But it is Allah that causes the sun to rise from the East: do you then cause it to rise from the West. Thus was he confounded who (in arrogance) rejected Faith.” (2:258) Again, it is obvious that Ibrahim (‘AS) knew the “art of argumentation” more than the king, because in spite of the fact that the king’s first response to Ibrahim’s (‘AS) challenge was incorrect, Ibrahim (‘AS) rounded off the argument by turning to such a universal fact which the king found impossible to respond. Thus was the unbeliever silenced!

 

 

 

Thus, it is clear that religion of monotheism is neither accepted without reason nor is it a blind imitation of one’s ancestors. It needs “conclusive proof” for acceptance and it is conveyed to the people through “wisdom, beautiful preaching and gracious argument.” (16:125) As God never compels people to accept the Truth, He says: “Then say to them: Allah’s is the conclusive argument. Surely, had He willed, He would have guided you all to the Truth.” (6:149) And, Prophet Ibrahim (‘AS) was the best “instrument of this Conclusive Argument of God!”

 

 

(Author is Assistant Professor, Islamic Studies, GDC Sogam, Lolab. Feedback: [email protected])

The Power of Values: Shaping the future through ethical education
Art and Calligraphy in the Constitution of India
Election 2024 and great expectations
Critical Importance of the Healthy Practice of Breastfeeding
Learned helplessness: An overview

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Copy Link Print
Previous Article Eid-ul-Adha: A Testament to Sacrifice and Compassion
Next Article Dir Sericulture extends Eid greetings, hails silkworm rearers, farmers
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

1MFollowersLike
262kFollowersFollow
InstagramFollow
234kSubscribersSubscribe
Google NewsFollow

Latest News

Tourism comes to grind halt in Sonamarg after Pahalgam terror attack
Kashmir
May 29, 2025
SKUAST-K to establish advanced reproductive biotechnology centre to enhance animal breeding
Kashmir
May 29, 2025
DC calls for intensified action against drug abuse at NCORD review in Gbl
Kashmir
May 29, 2025
Shikara operators continue to ignore mandatory safety protocols
City
May 29, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Tourism comes to grind halt in Sonamarg after Pahalgam terror attack
  • SKUAST-K to establish advanced reproductive biotechnology centre to enhance animal breeding
  • DC calls for intensified action against drug abuse at NCORD review in Gbl
  • Shikara operators continue to ignore mandatory safety protocols
  • IUST partners with government for building safer J&K

Recent Comments

  1. BASHIR AHMAD BHAT on Poor hotel accommodation, lack of medical facilities irk Kashmiri pilgrims in Saudi Arabia, video goes viral
  2. sree vishnu movies on Pahalgam attack shatters Kashmir’s film tourism revival
  3. SavePlus on AI and Behavioural Analytics in Gaming: Making the World of Gaming Better
  4. Parul on Govt acknowledges faulty streetlights on Narbal-Tangmarg road
  5. dr gora on Women Veterinarians and the Goal of Viksit Bharat

Contact Us

Flat No 7,Press Enclave, Srinagar, 190001
0194 2477887
9971795706
[email protected]
[email protected]

Quick Link

  • E-Paper
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Top Categories

Stay Connected

1.06MLike
262.5kFollow
InstagramFollow
234.3kSubscribe
WhatsAppFollow
Rising KashmirRising Kashmir
Follow US
© 2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?