‘Talks in State have to be on our terms, shunning of violence must for any engagement’
• Local youth joining militancy linked to propaganda intensity
• Army has curbed the funeral processions of slain militants
A day after supporting talks with Taliban, Army Chief Gen. Bipin Rawat said the same approach cannot be applied to Jammu and Kashmir, asserting that talks and terror cannot go together and that any engagement with militant groups in the state will be strictly on the basis of conditions set by the government.
The Army Chief also said that Pakistan's hostilities towards India along the border in J&K have not come down after Imran Khan came to power, adding the Pakistani leader was only talking about peace and not doing anything to improve the situation on the ground.
Gen. Rawat, addressing a press conference ahead of Army Day on January 15, also said over 300 militants are waiting along the border in Kashmir to infiltrate, but added his forces are ready foil their attempts.
"The government is adopting a hard and soft power approach in dealing with Kashmir...We are only facilitators for peace in J&K," he said.
Referring to a number of countries engaging in talks with Taliban, the Army Chief said India should not be out of the bandwagon as it has "interests" in Afghanistan.
"Same analogy cannot be applied to J&K. It is a bilateral issue between us and our western neighbour. There is no place for any third party intervention. Here if we have to talk, we have to talk based on our terms and conditions," said Gen. Rawat in his annual press conference.
In his address at the Raisina Dialogue on Wednesday, Gen. Rawat backed dialogue with the Taliban in Afghanistan.
"It is not one size fix all. You have to see your national interests, where you have different national interests, you take a different line," he added.
The Army Chief was asked about his comments on Wednesday backing talks with Taliban and whether he would support engaging Hurriyat Conference and other separatist groups in Kashmir.
"We are saying talks and terror cannot happen together. It is not only just applicable to our western neighbour, it is applicable to Jammu and Kashmir also. You cannot keep killing security personnel and say we are ready for talks," said the Army Chief.
"Talks can only happen if you give up violence," he added.
The Army Chief also said success in Jammu and Kashmir should not be measured by number of militants being killed and that people of the state were beginning to understand that violence was not the way forward.
He said of local youth joining militancy in Kashmir was linked to intensity of propaganda and was not related to killing of militants by security.
He said funeral processions of militants and conferring “martyr status” to them by Tanzims had encouraged youths to join the groups. “The Army has limited the processions which has shown positive results.”
"We have now started curtailing these (funeral processions). The now of people allowed to join the funeral processions have started gradually coming down. We are trying to control the crowd," he said.
The Army Chief said people of Jammu and Kashmir were beginning to realise the futility of violence.
"Youths in Kashmir are immensely terrorised by militants groups and Tanzims," he said.
On the situation in the state, he said, "I am not saying it's totally under control."
Gen Rawat suggested that the Supreme Court verdict on decriminalisation of gay sex may not be implemented in the Army.
“Such actions are forbidden in the Army,” he said.
At the same time, he added that the Army is not above the law.
"We will not allow this to happen in the Army," he said.
In what was hailed as a historic move, a five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court last September unanimously decriminalised part of the 158-year-old colonial law under Section 377 of the IPC which criminalises consensual unnatural sex, saying it violated the rights to equality.
When asked about the court ruling on adultery, he said the Army is conservative.
"We can't allow it to perpetrate into the Army," the Army chief said.
Last year, the Supreme Court had struck down a colonial-era anti-adultery law, saying it was unconstitutional, dented the individuality of women and treated them as "chattel of husbands".